In Union County, South Carolina, the once-thriving cotton mills that provided livelihoods for many have long disappeared. The county is now classified as a “food desert,” meaning that many of its residents live far from the nearest grocery store. Recognizing this issue, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby took action in 2016, collaborating with farmers to distribute discounted boxes of fresh produce throughout the county, where approximately 30% of the population is Black and around 25% live in poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby supported the project using her own savings and modest grants. Nonetheless, in 2023, her work gained considerable momentum when the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of a major national corporation—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This financial backing was included in a larger $1.5 million program designed to assist “community-focused non-profits led by individuals of color.”
“I was moved to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates what you do.”
A mere two years ago, initiatives like this received extensive support from large companies throughout the U.S., as the nation confronted systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life beneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Businesses like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken comparable actions, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.
This transition signifies a significant cultural change, influenced partly by concerns about legal disputes, regulatory oversight, and backlash on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has aggressively worked to dismantle DEI programs, advocating for a return to “merit-based opportunity” in America. He has ordered the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and launch investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of engaging in “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put almost 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump replaced the nation’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary had previously implied he should be dismissed due to his ties with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Initiatives similar to DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s, in reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to extend and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Initially framed under terms such as “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives aimed to counteract the long-standing consequences of slavery and the systemic discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to embrace “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within corporations and government agencies, DEI efforts largely focused on hiring policies that framed diversity as an economic advantage. Advocates argue that such programs address disparities across various communities, though much of the emphasis has historically been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
More recently, critics have amplified their claims that DEI initiatives—initially intended to fight discrimination—are in themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Sessions focusing on “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The foundation of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic concept positing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Gradually, efforts opposing CRT in education broadened into wider campaigns aiming to penalize “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant juncture came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively overturning decades of affirmative action practices.
This decision raised questions about the legal foundation of corporate DEI policies. After the ruling, Meta advised employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the termination of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI initiatives among large corporations prompts questions regarding the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public sentiment on DEI is polarized. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has decreased, yet support for associated matters—like equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey revealed that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI initiatives as advantageous.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-22099526461-695f119f7b254a52aee8839ff8d99daf.jpg "The stock market has thrived even with all this economic uncertainty")
